Which scenario exemplifies an improper lockout/tagout practice?

The scenario that exemplifies an improper lockout/tagout practice is failing to verify that the equipment is off before starting work. This is a critical step in the lockout/tagout process, as it ensures that the machinery is completely de-energized and safe to work on. If the equipment is not properly verified to be off, there is a significant risk of accidental startup, which can lead to serious injuries or even fatalities.

In contrast, tagging equipment before maintenance begins is a key part of the lockout/tagout process, as it communicates to all workers that the equipment should not be operated. Utilizing written lockout procedures is also essential, as it provides clear guidelines for safely shutting down and securing machines. Conducting a review of the procedures after an incident is a proactive approach to improving safety protocols and preventing future occurrences. These practices contribute to a safer work environment, highlighting the importance of verification as a critical component in lockout/tagout methods.